Added by on May 18, 2016

Datuk Azalina Othman, in her response to a question posed by the Member of Parliament for Bagan, Lim Guan Eng, claimed that the PAC Chairman Datuk Hasan Arifin has received information from Bank Negara (BNM) which claimed that the information provided by BNM was “confidential” and not meant to be used for the court of law or for public consumption.
“Pengerusi PAC (Datuk Hasan Arifin) menerima maklumat daripada Bank Negara Malaysia yang menyatakan bahawa segala maklumat yang diberi adalah berstatus ‘sulit bagi tujuan risikan sahaja dan bukan untuk kegunaan mahkamah atau laporan awam.”
She further claimed that PAC members have been informed of the above letter from the Deputy BNM Governor.
“Untuk makluman, semua anggota PAC telah dimaklumkan mengenai perkara ini melalui surat Pengerusi PAC kepada Timbalan Gabenor Bank Negara bertarikh 6 April.”
Let me state in unequivocal terms that Datuk Azalina Othman’s reply is at best misleading, at worst an outright lie with regards to the above matter.
The PAC had its final meeting which approved the final PAC Report on 1MDB for publication on 4 April 2016.  The report was tabled in Parliament 3 days later on the 7 April.
Datuk Hasan Arifin never at any point of time communicated with the PAC members on any developments subsequent to the meeting on the 4 April.  Hence PAC members were shocked to discover upon perusing the tabled report that two crucial lines in the report was deleted unilaterally by the PAC Chairman.
The deleted lines quoted an earlier Bank Negara clarification letter to the PAC, which stated that Good Star Limited, a recipient of US$1.03 billion of 1MDB funds meant for the latter’s investment with Petrosaudi International Limited, was “a company owned by an individual unrelated to Petrosaudi International”.
The deleted lines clearly indicate a brazen case of misappropriation by 1MDB which also proves the allegations made by the 1MDB critics such as The Sarawak Report, The Edge, The Wall Street Journal and opposition critics.
The question then is, what exactly are the damaging contents of this letter dated 6 April which is so “confidential” and cannot be shared with the public?
What is even more interesting however, is how come the Minister in the Prime Minister’s Department is privy to a letter from the Deputy Bank Negara Governor to the PAC Chairman dated 6 April when the members of the PAC are completely clueless above the matter?
Is there now a collusion between the PAC Chairman and the Prime Minister’s Department to cover up the entire scandal by scheming a coordinated response to the clear cut abuse of power by Datuk Hasan Arifin?
Tony Pua


News, Press Statement

Comments are closed.